If he was, then why does he keep tagging me directly on here and Facebook? Erroneously, I might add. @MaajidNawaz
-
-
Maajid and Usama didn't do too well with that in regards to Muhammad in this thread. They cherry pick.
@m_katoen@MaajidNawaz -
Yes. Can't help it really. Don't see why picking good bits & getting rid of nasty bits is a bad thing?
-
Morally bad, I mean. I see the problem epistemologically.
-
I'm happy they're tackling bad bits, but does that mean we give them a pass on *their* bad bits?
@m_katoen@MaajidNawaz -
Cool. I guess myself and
@REnlightenment will receive apologies from Maajid soon then ;-)@m_katoen@MaajidNawaz -
Not too concerned abt personal arguments.Maajid gets picked at & undermined from all angles
-
Maajid says no idea is above scrutiny. I agree with that. Hence I scrutinise Quilliam ideas.
@HPluckrose@iain_mk2@m_katoen@MaajidNawaz - 28 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@iain_mk2@m_katoen@MaajidNawaz But both think they are making Islam consistent with the wishes of a perfect God.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why not just acknowledge the 'bad bits'? That would be honest. It is 2016. Not 1716.
-
Obviously I support the reform movement.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.