The ban is silly, not because of the religious aspect, but because it's not that big of a deal, and the government shouldn't be making these decisions for parents.
-
-
Replying to @karnage_don
This stance assumes that it is better for parents to make these decisions for children than for governments to protect children's rights to make these decisions for themselves when they are old enough to do so. That parents have more rights over the child's body than the child.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Exactly. And that is the correct position in my opinion. Parents choose many things for their kids that will shape the rest of their lives, and that's the way it should be.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @karnage_don
We do need to justify these tho. Is it OK to make children brush their teeth? Yes. Why? Because their teeth need to last to adulthood when they can decide whether to care for them or not. Is it OK to brand children with the logo of your political party to mark their entry into it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Is it ok to get your child's ears pierced? Should the government ban that? Essentially, we're talking about cutting off a piece of arguably useless skin from a child's body. I don't see that as something the government should be involved in.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @karnage_don
No. I don't think the government should be involved in deciding whether someone has a bit of skin removed from their body either. We agree on that. What we disagree on is whether the individual gets to decide this or whether parents can do so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yes. I'm talking about all of this in the context of parents' rights. Should the government decide whether a parent can get their child's ears pierced? It mutilates the ear lobe for purely social reasons.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @karnage_don
No, governments should not decide whether kids should be pierced or cut or tattood either. They should consistently uphold every individual's right to make this decision for themselves and prosecute those who do it to those who don't or cannot consent.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
This contradicts itself. If the government is prosecuting parents for decisions they are making for their kids, then the government *is* making decisions for the parents.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
It's restricting what decisions parents can make for their kids, yes. Sometimes to support the individuals freedom of choice & belief, you have to criminalise private individuals who would deny it to those they have power over.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.