Likewise, Helen. Have a good evening and thanks for the discussion.
-
-
-
Replying to @farid_anvari @peez and
Daniël Lakens Retweeted Daniël Lakens
Please, no. That previous interview was already so bad that I couldn't listen to the end. There are many more worthwhile things for them to spend their time on.https://twitter.com/lakens/status/880021938575376384 …
Daniël Lakens added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This thread gives me the impression that a discussion with Helen would be a more fruitful and interesting discussion to listen to.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @farid_anvari @peez and
Perhaps - I've not seen the hoaxers really defend themselves against the massive criticism on what they did, and given that at least in The Netherlands all serious news organizations dismissed it as well, they might want to try to respond?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lakens @farid_anvari and
You're not paying attention to the numerous interviews we have given. Also, most gratified by support from the Netherlands.
#VrijLinks2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @farid_anvari and
I've never heard of Vrij Links - if that's it, that is saying quite a lot. I have indeed not seen any piece where a critical journalist interviewed you. Any links?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lakens @farid_anvari and
Try CBC, Radio 5, NPR. I recommend paying more attention to Vrij Links.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @farid_anvari and
I read the piece: https://www.vrij-links.nl/artikelen/nieuws/reeks-hoaxes-laat-problemen-in-geesteswetenschappen-zien/ … I understand why you like it - they just copied text from your own piece, and didn't interview anyone beyond yourself. That is exactly what I am saying is the problem. Maybe a real interview with
@verybadwizards would be good...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lakens @HPluckrose and
Also, when I say all major news outlets that didn't just ignore the the hoax were negative about it, it's perfectly fine to try to confirm your own beliefs by pointing to the only obscure website that was positive. But it's not a very strong reply.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You're simply wrong about that, I'm afraid. See New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Sunday Times etc. Even Mother Jones. I can't research for you, I'm afraid. And I don't have time for you. Muting now.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.