You called it a practical joke and said we were gleefully attacking *people* and it sounded as tho you said we had opposing views on gender equality. If you don't think any of that & accept that we had good motivations, we can disagree on whether this will help or be ethical.
You're not paying attention to the numerous interviews we have given. Also, most gratified by support from the Netherlands. #VrijLinks
-
-
I've never heard of Vrij Links - if that's it, that is saying quite a lot. I have indeed not seen any piece where a critical journalist interviewed you. Any links?
-
Try CBC, Radio 5, NPR. I recommend paying more attention to Vrij Links.
-
I will leave the conversation here. You have an unfortunately arrogant attitude which manifests by demanding people defend themselves against doing things you disagree with rather than looking up responses to critics and rating organisations on whether or you read/listen to them
-
As I've never heard of you, I see no reason to indulge it and if you already dismissed James' explanations of previous work & his his response to criticisms which he incorporated into the next project, I've no reason to think you'll be more open to me. You've said as much.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We maintain that it is grievance studies fields which need to defend themselves, not us, or better still, reform themselves.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.