One point that would have been nice to hear brought up in relation to this is that the authors do argue against these ideas in ways that don't involve hoaxes rather often. This project is supplementary to that. Meant to address some common responses to that argument.
-
-
Fair enough, you are right that I cannot with any authority say that you took delight in deceiving. That is uncharitable and I apologize.
-
Gladly accepted. I hope we will have more productive conversations in the future.
-
Likewise, Helen. Have a good evening and thanks for the discussion.
-
podcast interview?!
-
Please, no. That previous interview was already so bad that I couldn't listen to the end. There are many more worthwhile things for them to spend their time on.https://twitter.com/lakens/status/880021938575376384 …
-
This thread gives me the impression that a discussion with Helen would be a more fruitful and interesting discussion to listen to.
-
Perhaps - I've not seen the hoaxers really defend themselves against the massive criticism on what they did, and given that at least in The Netherlands all serious news organizations dismissed it as well, they might want to try to respond?
-
You're not paying attention to the numerous interviews we have given. Also, most gratified by support from the Netherlands.
#VrijLinks - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.