(Btw, I saw you asked about this earlier. When i referred to “controls” i simply meant trying the same exercise in another field, one you respect, and comparing the publication rates to see if they are less likely to accept these anthropological Trojans.)
Also, we are not claiming sloppiness in one field or that it is worse than in other fields. *Please* read the Areo piece. We think the peer review system works just fine. We are showing what is there, what we drew on, how we were directed,what we got in etc.
-
-
I will actually cut & paste the claims we made for you. What difference wld it make if we found another field to be better or worse in some way for knowledge production even if we could compare apples with oranges. If they were all worse, should we not address this specifically?pic.twitter.com/e0NokqIylM
-
My favorite part is “we will let you make up your own minds about that.”
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.