One point that would have been nice to hear brought up in relation to this is that the authors do argue against these ideas in ways that don't involve hoaxes rather often. This project is supplementary to that. Meant to address some common responses to that argument.
It's very hard to address the tone of that whole segment without justifiable criticisms of the same mindreading which I have objected being done to us, but yes, it did seem hostile to us & to assume our motivation was spite against people rather than continuation of sincere work
-
-
Well, unfortunately i can only appeal to my clarifications here. Our joking tone may be the culprit. But i do hope that our interaction at least undid some of what you felt. FWIW i found you to be a fair discussing here, and i appreciate that.
-
Fwiw, I was disappointed and a bit pissed when I initially heard the podcast and my response may have been a bit hyperbolic. I do think you were unfair with them though. I appreciate your in depth discussion here.
-
Thanks, Kevin.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.