It was generally uncharitable, yes, but we expected this. I think you are more upset about it than we are because you didn't expect it of VBW. And also know us and our motivations, obviously.
No, it is quite possible to say, as even the Wall Street Journal did, that they thought this approach unethical but that it does point to a serious problem in the field.
-
-
But “real peer review” points the problem pretty effectively.
-
They do a lot of good highlighting the problem, yes. It doesn't mean the rest of shouldn't address it too and in a number of ways. People get the madness from RPR. I hope to show how it works so they know how to counter it.
-
This is why I have written a series of essays breaking down the key ideas underlying the problem & how it evolved & spread & how it manifests in society & am also writing a book to do this in more detail. We also wanted to participate in it from the inside to show how it works.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.