Both Helen and James have passionately argued for gender equality in a number of places. Your quote here suggested they're opposed to it.
-
-
None of which were assessments I made (are you saying that’s been my tactic?)
-
You called it a practical joke and said we were gleefully attacking *people* and it sounded as tho you said we had opposing views on gender equality. If you don't think any of that & accept that we had good motivations, we can disagree on whether this will help or be ethical.
-
I said that I don’t like the delight in deceiving people to make a point.
-
And I think that is uncharitable. We were not delighted to have deceived people. We were delighted to have a paper accepted and amused by the mad comments.
-
Fair enough, you are right that I cannot with any authority say that you took delight in deceiving. That is uncharitable and I apologize.
-
Gladly accepted. I hope we will have more productive conversations in the future.
-
Likewise, Helen. Have a good evening and thanks for the discussion.
-
podcast interview?!
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.