And it'd be one thing if this was just a misstatement since this is basically live, but it's mixed in with a bunch of unfair mind-reading about their supposedly smug, gleeful intentions to hurt people.
That would be a method to test the proposition that other fields have no or fewer problems and we don't know or claim that to be the case. Also, it would rightly be pointed out that we were comparing proper papers written with much knowledge to papers that fudged some language.
-
-
But i have been thinking that maybe a control could have been that we tried to submit papers which argued for evidence based epistemology & consistent liberal ethics to the same journals?
-
But, in reality, if you look at reviewer comments, you'll see a control on whether you have to stick to orthodoxy anyway because we were faulted many times and rejected many times for not doing so.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.