I just listened again and @peez also explicitly claims that they're motivated to vocally disagree with some of the views that people in these fields have and he gives an example of "gender equality" implying that these authors are opposed to gender equality. That was insane.
No. Please read the Areo piece. We say it is best understood as a reflexive ethnography. Going inside a system and reflecting its ways back at it. To properly understand it. To become experts in it. And turn out exemplary papers addressing our main concerns.
-
-
And yes, we really didn't want to call it a hoax. We call that "the "H' word" and asked people not to use it. This is not a series a jokes. We asked the Wall Street Journal not to call it that repeatedly but we had no say over that ultimately.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.