This is another weird tangent. I am not doing this all day. Responding to people who reply to my tweet with a major very basic speaking point which does not relate or contradict my tweet.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Fair enough, you don't have to do this all day. I am simply pointing out that many of us who've admired you being willing to critique what's going on in the academy are pretty confused that you'd be backing gender ideology.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @OVAndOut @HPluckrose
And absolutely, it's a weird tangent but lesbians being pressured to sleep with men is a direct result of "transwomen are women, no debate" style activism, supported by the pomo academy.https://lesbian-rights-nz.org/shame-receipts/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @OVAndOut
Yes, I know this is an issue but you need to respond to what I am saying, not raise your own issue coz I have mentioned the general subject. This is happening over and over again because people think in broad clusters of ideas where if you say one thing, you believe the whole set
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @OVAndOut
"But lesbians are being pressured to have sex with trans women" simply isn't a valid response to: "Don't erase trans people"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Lesbians are being told that the category of lesbianism should include males, which in itself erases lesbianism as its own political category & orientation: an act of erasure. Similarly, the female category is threatened which has impacted rights to female only spaces & services.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OVAndOut
Yes, thank you. I know this. It doesn't relate to what I said. You cannot assume that I don't know this or think it is fine because I have said that trans people shouldn't be erased. You're thinking in black & white dichotomies and clusters of ideas.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I assumed your initial tweet was in response to the clarification of the definition of legal sex, so that it would refer to biology over identity? I am pointing out when it refers to identity, as trans ideology would like it to, it causes other legal 'erasures'.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OVAndOut
Yes, I addressed those here. That tweet was not about that tho.https://areomagazine.com/2017/09/27/an-argument-for-a-liberal-and-rational-approach-to-transgender-rights-and-inclusion/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Wonderful, thank you for consistently linking me your very rational argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It's just a lot easier than explaining my views on how trans acceptance could affect women's rights again in multiple tweets.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Fair play to you, I do the same with this quite often.http://sexandgenderintro.com
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.