Turned out? Was Stefan’s nature in any doubt over the past decade? Again, this isn’t about being ideologically cloistered, it is about choosing to repeatedly happily converse with someone who ran a predatory online cult and is a fairy blatant misogynist/racist.
-
-
Replying to @C_Kavanagh @SkepticReview89 and
You can disagree that that's a good thing to do. He also tries to talk to antifa and the most extreme feminists, BTW. But whatever you think of his judgement in that doesn't say anything about the project or his/our motivation in this.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @SkepticReview89 and
Did he repeatedly appear with extreme feminists/antifa advocates to bash the excesses of the far right? If so I would genuinely like to see that. I disagree it’s irrelevant. It speaks to his judgment and what he considers important. It doesn’t automatically impugn you or the ...
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C_Kavanagh @HPluckrose and
... project overall. But it is relevant when assessing his involvement. What you call bad judgment, I call pandering. He didn’t go on to challenge Stefan on his lack of critical thinking/abuse of research on race. He went on to bash feminism.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @C_Kavanagh @SkepticReview89 and
OK. I'll leave you to talk about character, motivation and association of authors rather than their ideas but I am disappointed. We do bash feminism tho. Yes. That's an actual stated position to engage with that doesn't require mindreading or guilt by association.
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @C_Kavanagh and
I've been following this conversation -- don't have time to really participate right now, but I will say that while I don't doubt your motives certain associations are a real problem.
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @CathyYoung63 @HPluckrose and
If you bash feminism on Molyneux's podcast, you're basically giving reinforcement to someone known for saying extreme misogynist stuff. (*Really* misogynist, not in the "SJW" sense.)
4 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @CathyYoung63 @HPluckrose and
(And I know it's not you, it's PB. Also, FWIW, I'm on your side re
#SokaledSquare and I hope to write about it.)2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @CathyYoung63 @C_Kavanagh and
Thank you! But I will take exception to people insisting Peter is racist or sexist too because I know him & it's entirely unjustified. Nobody who knows him can think this. I don't expect anyone else to take my word for that but it is true so I will defend.
2 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @C_Kavanagh and
I’m not saying he is! Just that it’s poor judgement imho
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
I know you weren't. I'm explaining why I'm getting defensive.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @CathyYoung63 and
Helen, keep up the great work. Don't listen to those that tell you what your priorities are/should be. Wait...is that me? Am I meta-doing to you what I just said you shouldn't allow other people to do to you? Ah!
0 replies 0 retweets 5 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.