OK, you can consider it bad judgement to do that. I don't know Molyneux but see occasional deranged tweets. But we shouldn't judge someone on them having talked to someone mad & horrible. Peter is the furthest thing from a misogynist or misogyny enabler that I can imagine.
-
-
I actually completely agree with that but I think that what you just found frustratingly obvious is exactly the same way I feel about your transparent efforts to self servingly frame this discussion in a manner that makes you the only honest participant.
-
I think you're honest! I'm sure you genuinely think that what's important to discuss is a load of other people you associate with criticisms of SocJus scholarship and activism as context rather than what we did & why. I find this flawed for the reasons I gave & I want out.
-
In this particular thread yes because that's what I was discussing. If I was discussing the merits of your hoax and problems of certain fields that would be a different discussion. But I also want out. So let's leave it at that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.