If you bash feminism on Molyneux's podcast, you're basically giving reinforcement to someone known for saying extreme misogynist stuff. (*Really* misogynist, not in the "SJW" sense.)
That doesn't make any sense. I am addressing what you did not asserting that you said you were going to do it. Please go away now if you won't have an honest discussion.
-
-
I can say that someone disregarded one thing and spoke about something else at length even if they don't say "I'm going to disregard this thing and talk about something else at length" Good grief.
-
I actually completely agree with that but I think that what you just found frustratingly obvious is exactly the same way I feel about your transparent efforts to self servingly frame this discussion in a manner that makes you the only honest participant.
-
I think you're honest! I'm sure you genuinely think that what's important to discuss is a load of other people you associate with criticisms of SocJus scholarship and activism as context rather than what we did & why. I find this flawed for the reasons I gave & I want out.
-
In this particular thread yes because that's what I was discussing. If I was discussing the merits of your hoax and problems of certain fields that would be a different discussion. But I also want out. So let's leave it at that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.