I've been following this conversation -- don't have time to really participate right now, but I will say that while I don't doubt your motives certain associations are a real problem.
-
-
I'm sure some people do make unjustified guilt by association dismissals of your entire project. That isn't what I am doing. I have not dismissed the project, nor have I dismissed you on the basis of your co-authors actions.
-
OK but I'm not going to sit around waiting for you to stop talking about Rubin, Peterson & Harris as the context in which it shld be read even tho I ignore Rubin, find Peterson the biggest barrier to addressing the problem, admire Harris & none of them had anything to do with it
-
Grand. I don't recall stating they had anything to do with the project. I also didn't say Molyneux did. I'm also not forcing you to go back and forth here. I'm mainly responding to you. Happy to agree to disagree.
-
Well, they were part of what you called "a more in depth examination of the pros and cons and surrounding context of your efforts." I wouldn't judge your work in the context of a lot of what is coming out of cultural anthropology tho.
-
You'll notice I'm engaging with you and what you say and not the worst examples of anthropology or anyone you might once have been in conference with who has said something certifiably insane.
-
Ok, last response for me... 1. Cognitive not Cultural anthropology, important difference. 2. You shouldn't judge me on who I attended a conference with (no control), 3. You should factor in who I associate with & what I often talk about; especially if I am pally with ideologues.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.