Turned out? Was Stefan’s nature in any doubt over the past decade? Again, this isn’t about being ideologically cloistered, it is about choosing to repeatedly happily converse with someone who ran a predatory online cult and is a fairy blatant misogynist/racist.
-
-
How about the fact that in most of the above I am responding to specific questions you asked! For instance, you specifically ask me to lay out the biases of classical liberals. I have explicitly distinguished you, James, and Peter and said from the start that people should...
-
... consider the content of your critique and what you found. To make it even more explicit THEY SHOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT IDEOLOGICAL PANDERING = SCIENTIFIC MERIT in some fields. But acknowledging that does not mean it is deflecting to consider the biases/agenda of those ...
-
... involved. Which include you, PB, and James and potentially your mystery funder. I accept your reasons for not disclosing funding btw but it is not a non-issue. Now, where in that did I say ignore all your findings because PB talked to Molyneux?
-
You didn't say to. You just did it.
-
And this happens repeatedly. I raise the results of the project & people say "well we know some papers can be really bad but what about the time one of you talked to Rubin and Molyneux or when Peterson retweeted you and they're all connected to Sam Harris who spoke to Murray?
-
I'm sure some people do make unjustified guilt by association dismissals of your entire project. That isn't what I am doing. I have not dismissed the project, nor have I dismissed you on the basis of your co-authors actions.
-
OK but I'm not going to sit around waiting for you to stop talking about Rubin, Peterson & Harris as the context in which it shld be read even tho I ignore Rubin, find Peterson the biggest barrier to addressing the problem, admire Harris & none of them had anything to do with it
-
Grand. I don't recall stating they had anything to do with the project. I also didn't say Molyneux did. I'm also not forcing you to go back and forth here. I'm mainly responding to you. Happy to agree to disagree.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You've just said "We need to look more broadly at context" and then that was all you did. Perhaps in another conversation, I could succeed in bringing you back to the project & significance of it but that didn't happen today. All about people who had zero to do with the project.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.