A sign of the times and/or a sign that you have attracted a disproportionate amount of ideological followers. Nuance should be seen as positive tho, I wish more people were willing to piss off their audience in favour of honesty.
-
-
Replying to @C_Kavanagh @SkepticReview89 and
Are you a liberal lefty? You sound like a liberal lefty. If so, this is all aimed primarily at you.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @SkepticReview89 and
Unsure afte previous confusion if this is aimed at me. If it is, I’d say I’m a centre left person. Certainly not far left.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C_Kavanagh @HPluckrose and
I also feel like your moving dangerously close to guilt by association.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @SkepticReview89 @C_Kavanagh and
Yes. Too much of the "you've has conversations with someone who turned out to be a ideological loon."
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @SkepticReview89 and
Turned out? Was Stefan’s nature in any doubt over the past decade? Again, this isn’t about being ideologically cloistered, it is about choosing to repeatedly happily converse with someone who ran a predatory online cult and is a fairy blatant misogynist/racist.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C_Kavanagh @SkepticReview89 and
You can disagree that that's a good thing to do. He also tries to talk to antifa and the most extreme feminists, BTW. But whatever you think of his judgement in that doesn't say anything about the project or his/our motivation in this.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @SkepticReview89 and
Did he repeatedly appear with extreme feminists/antifa advocates to bash the excesses of the far right? If so I would genuinely like to see that. I disagree it’s irrelevant. It speaks to his judgment and what he considers important. It doesn’t automatically impugn you or the ...
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C_Kavanagh @HPluckrose and
... project overall. But it is relevant when assessing his involvement. What you call bad judgment, I call pandering. He didn’t go on to challenge Stefan on his lack of critical thinking/abuse of research on race. He went on to bash feminism.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @C_Kavanagh @SkepticReview89 and
OK. I'll leave you to talk about character, motivation and association of authors rather than their ideas but I am disappointed. We do bash feminism tho. Yes. That's an actual stated position to engage with that doesn't require mindreading or guilt by association.
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
I can see that we're not ever going to actually discuss the project and its significance but your own perception of other people's biases, motivations, other conversations and associations. So, no progress can happen. I thought it might but I've wasted my time. Goodbye.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.