Just for the record that’s not what I’ve said. I haven’t said Boghossian is anti science and I’ve only said it is possible to identify biases and ideological agendas through applying normal skepticism/critical thinking. Ignoring all context isn’t being pure and objective.
-
-
Greatest paper ever. It's truly amazing for anyone that hasn't read it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like something someone trapped in their own biases would say! B-b-but what if I'm trapped in MY own bias and that's why i said that?! No. They're biased and I'm not. They have power and I don't.
-
It's a pretty impossible argument--right up there with the unconscious bias you don't know you have but someone else with report you to the bias response team for. ugh.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s not my argument though. I’m not suggesting to outright dismiss what you did because of secret biases. You don’t like being misrepresented and neither do I. I am arguing people should look critically at content/context. For ex, HdX academy article did this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.