Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
HPluckrose's profile
Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose
@HPluckrose

Tweets

Helen Pluckrose

@HPluckrose

Editor @AreoMagazine Secular, liberal humanist. Mother. Doglover. Writing book about epistemology & ethics on the academic left Helen.pluckrose@areomagazine.com

London.
areomagazine.com/author/hpluckr…
Joined August 2011

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh Oct 22
      Replying to @SkepticReview89 @HPluckrose and

      Just for the record that’s not what I’ve said. I haven’t said Boghossian is anti science and I’ve only said it is possible to identify biases and ideological agendas through applying normal skepticism/critical thinking. Ignoring all context isn’t being pure and objective.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 22
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @SkepticReview89 and

      Good. He's definitely not anti-science. You can detect his biases and ideological agendas best through reading him write about them tho or listening to him talk about them.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    3. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh Oct 22
      Replying to @HPluckrose @SkepticReview89 and

      For instance, on his discussions with Stefan Molyneux? Would you recommend that as a good resource for folks interested?

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh Oct 22
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @HPluckrose and

      That’s snark. But it’s snark with a point. I don’t think Peter entirely acknowledges his biases. No one does. But different folks make more/less effort to combat them.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 22
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @SkepticReview89 and

      I don't know what that means. Too vague.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh Oct 22
      Replying to @HPluckrose @SkepticReview89 and

      Your suggestion to listen to Peter’s talks to hear him identify biases sounds, to be blunt, naive. He does talk about cognitive biases but that doesn’t mean he consistently applies such insight to accurately assess his own positions/biases. Generally people are not great judges..

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh Oct 22
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @HPluckrose and

      ... of their own biases. They are good at pointing out others though. Again, see Sam Harris for endless illustrations of this in action.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    8. Arthur Dent‏ @ArthurCDent Oct 22
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @HPluckrose and

      1/2 Listened to Sam interview a gun advocate from the NRA. He let him talk, and was sympathetic to his points. I *hate* guns, and couldn't be more unsympathetic. The guy made some good points, and some very bad points. My opinion is unchanged, but I found it a worthwhile listen.

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    9. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh Oct 22
      Replying to @ArthurCDent @HPluckrose and

      Sure but listen to how Sam reacts when people criticise his biases. Particularly when they come from the left. His debate with Ezra Klein is very good example of how Sam dismisses his biases as largely irrelevant/under control.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Skeptic Review‏ @SkepticReview89 Oct 22
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @ArthurCDent and

      That's not what Helen is talking about tho. She is explaining for the umpteenth time that her motives are stated, and if you don't believe them, then I don't think there's a clear answer here.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 22
      Replying to @SkepticReview89 @C_Kavanagh and

      One of our papers is actually about this. It argues that people cannot criticise SocJus scholarship coz doing so is just evidence of being trapped in their biases. It got snapped up fastest. Can't talk if someone wants to argue with, not you, but the biases they assume you have

      9:34 PM - 22 Oct 2018
      • 1 Like
      • Skeptic Review
      3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        1. Skeptic Review‏ @SkepticReview89 Oct 22
          Replying to @HPluckrose @C_Kavanagh and

          Greatest paper ever. It's truly amazing for anyone that hasn't read it.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. aleks iirōn musuku‏ @aleksjames54 Oct 22
          Replying to @HPluckrose @SkepticReview89 and

          Sounds like something someone trapped in their own biases would say! B-b-but what if I'm trapped in MY own bias and that's why i said that?! No. They're biased and I'm not. They have power and I don't.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Skeptic Review‏ @SkepticReview89 Oct 22
          Replying to @aleksjames54 @HPluckrose and

          It's a pretty impossible argument--right up there with the unconscious bias you don't know you have but someone else with report you to the bias response team for. ugh.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh Oct 22
          Replying to @HPluckrose @SkepticReview89 and

          That’s not my argument though. I’m not suggesting to outright dismiss what you did because of secret biases. You don’t like being misrepresented and neither do I. I am arguing people should look critically at content/context. For ex, HdX academy article did this.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info