He's very polite but he won't agree that he can know biases and agendas through probabilities and that particularly Boghossian is anti science, so we had to leave it there.
-
-
I think for the most part in this thread, that was overwhelmingly a very positive response. The work is very admired.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We can... and we should. But we also shouldn’t act like networks people are involved in are entirely irrelevant. This is Rubin’s schtick and it requires wilful ignorance to ignore the blatant patterns in content.
-
Throw Rubin out of your mind You're not listening to Helen. It's about the work. Rubin has nothing to do with anything here.
-
He's not going to listen to me. He's going to go on about how I collaborate with someone who has spoken with someone who has said bad things and also possibly could be said to have the biases associated with a certain kind of classical liberal. Its like the project didn't happen.
-
Sigh... if you say so. I thought we were having broader discussion and it was ok to make references to things we both understand to illustrate a point. Your summary of my position reads to me as very convenient. I thought I was clear about value of the project but nevermind.
-
You have to realize by now that these people are not arguing in good faith.
-
He's still there stalking and obsessing. I'm going to have to block him. I can't see him bit other people keep getting dragged into his nastiness.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.