... a more in depth examination of the pros and cons and surrounding context of your efforts. I don’t deny you the right to explain your motivation but that doesn’t mean I have to uncritically swallow it.
-
-
"Aims are good" is what I see. Period. Nor do I really feel your politics, or Dr. Conceptual's politics, or Boghossian's politics are particularly relevant to an examination of academic rigor. I think it sad you even have to say you are left leaning.
-
I think we need to because we are addressing politics and it matters from what perspective. We criticise the left differently from how the right will. We won't confuse postmodernism with Marxism, for example.
-
Honest question Chris. What are your biases, and how do they affect your reading of Helen's work?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.