... a more in depth examination of the pros and cons and surrounding context of your efforts. I don’t deny you the right to explain your motivation but that doesn’t mean I have to uncritically swallow it.
-
-
Your suggestion to listen to Peter’s talks to hear him identify biases sounds, to be blunt, naive. He does talk about cognitive biases but that doesn’t mean he consistently applies such insight to accurately assess his own positions/biases. Generally people are not great judges..
-
... of their own biases. They are good at pointing out others though. Again, see Sam Harris for endless illustrations of this in action.
-
Too vague.
-
What’s vague? Do you want me to list the usual biases of classical liberals? I would imagine you have encountered them. I asked the Q about Rubin earlier partly to assess whether you recognise such biases exist.
-
Yes. "I suspect this person of having the usual biases of the classical liberal" is too vague. They vary a lot on values but are usually close to libertarians, particularly economically. This is just tribal bias of yours. Look at individuals and what they say.
-
It's really easy if you just take a step back and try. It's much more intellectually satisfying too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.