Because there certainly are an appalling amount who self identify as scientifically minded, rationalists who have revealed themselves to be, at the very least, more concerned about liberal irrationalism than the rise of an illiberal right across the US and Europe.
Huh? What does this relate to? I was agreeing with you. You said its naive to think we don't have an ideological and political agenda when we clearly do and I'm saying you're right. You now disagree that we that do or disagree with something else?
-
-
It might be just the way the threading worked. I read the response as suggesting that I had not read your Areo article if I did not agree that the hoax was entirely non-ideological/political.
-
I see. Maybe conversation possible then. But that wouldn't be agreeing with us. Its not us claiming not to be advocating a political & ideological stance. In that piece we set out what it is. I was saying that our own words support your correct reading of the situation.
-
I appreciate that. I’m not trying to misrepresent your position or to dismiss your efforts. Caustic sarcasm is side effect of personality and being Northern Irish.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.