I probably can't explain that on Twitter. Particularly as people go one way or another on whether it includes a load of cognitive, psychological and behavioural stuff which is biological.
-
-
I suspect we’re still a long way from definitive science. As you said it’s clear the “trans movement” is being influenced by ideologues, so self ID would be reckless, esp in a country of 65mil. I understand you may support self ID in principle, but do you support it practice?
-
Ps: I really don’t like the idea we’re “extreme”, the trans movement is a very well funded juggernaut with real ideologues, opposition isn’t extreme, imho.
-
Do you have any peer reviewed “hard” trans science? I live with a science editor & I’d like to run through it. I worry “radfems” could be easily labelled “anti-science” b/c often factual findings sound fictional, but I also suspect it’s been co-opted by ideology. Many thanks x
-
I haven't researched it since I write the article and I've seen quite a lot crop up since then but not gone through it. Should be easy to find tho.
@GiovannaLiviana also keeps up with it, I think? -
Ta x
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.