I am so fed up with the argument "Don't address problems on the left coz it feeds the right." It isn't enough to point out the problems on the other side & call people names for voting for them. Isn't this clear yet? To get elected, the left needs to be credible & respectworthy.
-
-
James told Vox that he is in favor of shutting down identity studies. You all need to get your stories straight
-
I note the article doesn’t quote his words & you haven’t acknowledged the caveat. It’s not unreasonable to opine that if one can’t tell the difference between their good scholarship & bad how can one trust any of it.
-
The article does quote him. Do you feel the same in regards to Economic Studies?
-
Sigh, of course it’s quoted him, but it hasn’t quoted the sentence you’re upset by. And in response to your whataboutism question, the field of economics revealed its huge flaws in 2008 & still hasn’t fixed the problem although ppl are working on it
#minsky -
If bringing up Economics is whataboutism than this entire study is an exercise in whataboutism.
-
You’re giving me a headache. You’re illogical in your reasoning, reactionary in attitude, and uncharitable in your critiques. For these reasons I don’t want to discuss this with you anymore.
-
The authors and their support are the biggest cry babies I’ve encountered. If you don’t want to be criticized than don’t promote yourselves.
-
Sadly I must now mute you
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I know. I’m listening. You might have misunderstood me. You James & Peter are giving the caveats that are needed to reveal your integrity. I’m talking about the RW pundits, not their loons who’ve they’ve fed nonesense to for decades. I’m waiting for evidence of their integrity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.