thanku @HPluckrose for making articulate my hypotheis:
H0: EA breeds EA
corrollary: EA votes *against* #Trump
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Dr Lee's study has N= 1.1 million.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i mean, im muted but all that is just irrelevent 2 my work Pluckrose is trying to change liberals to ...umm...get more ppl to vote liberal? thats not why Trump got elected i suspect differential educational attainment (EA) is 1 reason and there will b rich harvests of data in Nov
-
That is not what she is doing - you are assuming that she is trying to change voting, but she is not. ALL she is doing is correcting an area of work that is riddled with internal inconsistencies and hypocrisy. No agenda beyond that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It was just positing the hypothesis that with greater educational attainment more people would vote against Trump. It lacks the premises between the hypothesis and the conclusion. /US higher ed is odd, so many useless degrees but so many people pay for them - I don't get it.
-
that wont matter in the polling data. the polls dont discriminate btwn types of EA college and non-college if u prefer. already showing gaps.pic.twitter.com/AiVglU35QO
-
only demo Trump still carries according to the polling is non-college white men but it will be a lot more clear after the midterms-- there will be lashings of data, scads of data, piles and hills and mountains of data! cant waitpic.twitter.com/IlxsLzXexZ
-
Are you even listening? No-one was talking about US elections. It is just you. ONLY you.
-
???? Helen was blaming liberals for Trump being elected. u missed that?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.