re: Grievance Studies hoax
I agree that it would have been more convincing if the @ConceptualJames, @HPluckrose and @peterboghossian had also demonstrated that other academic departments didn't have this problem, but...https://youtu.be/NSSV0I8g560?t=4199 …
-
-
Replying to @agoonforhire @tweetertation and
I'm not sure what this means tho. We targeted fields as diverse as geography and social work. The only thing they had to have in common was a journal which focused on identity studies of some kind within its scope. I'm sure you'll appreciate that we couldn't submit out of scope.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @tweetertation and
I think Phoebe's point is that having a scope beyond which you didn't submit necessarily means you haven't shown there's a difference between what is in scope and what is not in scope.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @agoonforhire @HPluckrose and
My perspective is that you had an appropriate scope because you would have had diminishing returns on your effort outside that scope.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @agoonforhire @tweetertation and
We;d just have got desk rejected. If we'd sent a paper of the social construction of masculinity to an economics journal, they'd have returned it and pointed out they were an economics journal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @tweetertation and
That's not even close to what I'm suggesting... I get the impression that you think I'm arguing against you somehow... but I'm arguing *for* you. I agree with everything you've said. I'm defending your work here
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @agoonforhire @tweetertation and
I don't necessarily think you're against us! You made it clear you weren't from the start. I think you've misunderstood the scope of our project and am trying to set out very clearly why we couldn't do what you suggest.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @tweetertation and
I think I was a little bit off on the scope of your project.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @agoonforhire @tweetertation and
Yes. I apologise if I kind of machine-gunned you in explaining this. I've been told I do this although I am aiming to be clear and comprehensive rather than aggressive and this is clearer when you can hear me rather than reading me.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @tweetertation and
No apology is warranted. You have skin in the game; I don't. I think whatever you're doing is working, so keep it up.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Thanks Aaron.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.