Watch (or listen to) @katrosenfield Blogginghead some more Feminine Chaos!https://youtu.be/NSSV0I8g560
Therefore we submitted papers to a wide range of disciplines which pass papers through on very specific criteria which we outlned in our explanation in Areo in order to show they were doing that and draw attention to the problem.
-
-
Other fields can certainly have problems.Someone just submitted a paper to us looking at problems within journals which publish medical research claiming that the study design doesn't always meet the required standards for testing paediatric medication.This is a different problem
-
They could test this by sending research which falls short of this to a number of them and showing that this happens. They couldn't send it to a gender studies journal. Nor would it make any sense to do that because the problem of misleading medical data is not comparable.
-
Nor would it be reasonable to criticise them for focusing solely on potentially dangerous medicine rather than extending their critique to radical constructivism in identity studies. They're medical scientists. They're allowed to worry about their own field.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.