Watch (or listen to) @katrosenfield Blogginghead some more Feminine Chaos!https://youtu.be/NSSV0I8g560
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @tweetertation @katrosenfield
re: Grievance Studies hoax I agree that it would have been more convincing if the
@ConceptualJames,@HPluckrose and@peterboghossian had also demonstrated that other academic departments didn't have this problem, but...https://youtu.be/NSSV0I8g560?t=4199 …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @agoonforhire @tweetertation and
I'm not sure what this means tho. We targeted fields as diverse as geography and social work. The only thing they had to have in common was a journal which focused on identity studies of some kind within its scope. I'm sure you'll appreciate that we couldn't submit out of scope.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @tweetertation and
I think Phoebe's point is that having a scope beyond which you didn't submit necessarily means you haven't shown there's a difference between what is in scope and what is not in scope.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
What was in scope was everything which included the kind of scholarship we were looking at. If you mean that our study doesn't show there aren't also problems in other form of scholarship, no, it doesn't. We'd only need to show that if we claimed there weren't.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.