Women report not “getting up the nerve” to ask questions, so researchers propose that “question time be unlimited” at scientific talks. Because, you know, time is a construct. If you won’t hang around waiting for others to speak, you must be a misogynist.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202743 …
-
-
Helen, I wrote your comment down from an event you did with Heather, Peter, and James in Portland last year. May not be word for word: "If we are assuming the choices men make as the ultimate best choices, we are making men the default humans, which is sexist and infantilizing...
-
I was reminded of this point too - which I feel isn’t really being echoed in what you’re saying now, Helen. I don’t think unlimited question time sounds like a great solution but nor do I think the answer is that women just have to learn to act like men to compete.
-
Realistically, we do, I'm afraid. We can't socially engineer situations in which more women struggle so they don't. When I say that women don't have to make the same choices as men to be worthwhile, I still think they have to bear the consequences of those choices - eg lower pay.
-
Yes, and if I remember the discussion correctly, Helen, you followed up the "men-default human" premise with the idea: it follows therefore that if women aren't making the same choices men are, they're doing something wrong or have fallen prey to malicious patriarchy programming.
-
That is the claim, yes. I'm not sure if you see the same inconsistency that Rebecca does or not? Do you think if we accept that men & women differ on average, this gives us a responsibility to alter things to make women do the same things as men?
-
I default to an anti-engineering bias when discussing solutions here. In the spirit of academic noblesse oblige the best that can be done is to NOT discourage women, in any reasonable context...and I think we may be there or close to there.
-
I heard that Oxford University introduced the option for students to do their exams at home, as girls weren't doing as well as boys in their exams in relation to their general aptitude, and they guessed this was to do with females being more nervous under exam conditions...
-
Sounds great in theory, if checks and balances tag this type of accommodation imprudent for those wanting careers where performance under pressure is a desired feature....surgeon comes to mind.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We have to ditch poor little girl, safe space, trigger warning narratives & realize practice (and exposure) really does make perfect. I think a lot of this comes from toxic helicopter parenting, which is having severe negative impact on children - (at this point) adults mental,
-
I think you're right! Just as use of antibacterial soap may have had the unintended effect of increasing allergies. It's probably affecting men too, but due to "toxic masculinity" (men afraid to talk) & pervasive feminist knee-jerking in the media we don't hear so much about that
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Girl yes. Came here to say the same thing, but you worded your thread beautifully and probably better than I would have worded mine.pic.twitter.com/Oi9TTFMyAv
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well yes, I can assure you that speaking in public is hard on anyone, I have struggled with it. I have a shaky right leg so I love being able to hide behind a lectern
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've found that one of the most effective methods or building confidence in both men and women is by encouraging them to utilize the words "I am enough"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.