I should just ignore it but people scratching that itch which makes them do pointmissing pedantry set off an itch in me. I have an inability to endure loose ends so I will follow them down those rabbit holes trying to tie them up & get them to see why their exception isn't one.
-
Show this thread
-
For my own peace of mind. Might be OCD brain. If there is something which does not work in my logical reasoning, it must either be made to work or the reasoning changed to accommodate it coz it's a genuine problem. It can't just sit there being disorderly & not fitting in.
4 replies 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread -
Because my OCD was always obsessive rather than compulsive. I think the equivalent of this for someone like my father whose OCD was compulsive would be someone coming in and making his flannels and towels unsymmetrical. He couldn't ignore that either. Must. Restore. Order.
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likesShow this thread -
My father channelled his OCD through numbers and systems which satisfied his need for order and made him a very successful businessman. I feel the need to tidy up disorderly verbal/ideological reasoning systems. Set it all out, see how it functions & show the problems with it.
1 reply 2 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
My daughter seems to do both, bless her. Has the knack for coding and is frankly incredulous and impatient with anyone who doesn't see how it works. This is interspersed with sarcastically dismantling any bad arguments she comes across in her daily life.
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
Interestingly, while I was diagnosed with OCD, my father & daughter both suspected by doctors of having Asperger's. We don't know coz neither give a fuck & refuse testing. Either way, 3 generations of us now intent on bringing order & clarity to shit whether you like it or not.
4 replies 2 retweets 29 likesShow this thread -
I do think a lot of whether you are likely to have a brain which requires things to work logically in demonstrable steps or whether you are fulfilled by ambiguous & fluffy allusive thinking with loose connections comes down to personality type. Which is discouraging.
3 replies 2 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
It means we can't teach the fluffy thinkers to find logical reasoning and evidence-based epistemology satisfying and they cannot teach us to value spiritual/affective/mythical/metaphysical notions of truth. We just have to glare at each other and mutter darkly.
7 replies 1 retweet 17 likesShow this thread -
Of course, many people manage to do both. I see this most strongly in some believing Jewish friends whose working lives require strong skills of analytical reasoning but then they take a hiatus at least once a week to be all spiritual and fluffy. Tut on them. "Tut," I say.
7 replies 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yay for non-overlapping magisterium. I can be a scientist and still contemplate meta-physics... I mean quantum mechanics is a kind of magic after all.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.