No, a better analogy would be if you took something self-evidently absurd, like the amount of farts contributing to total GDP, and if you dressed it up in all the right neoclassical equations to get it accepted. That would discredit the journal and neoclassical economics.
-
-
I admittedly haven't gotten much further than muh reason, consistency and evidence itself a bit vague but "grievance" studies absolutely plays to a very aggrieved crowed with all the necessary vagaries for their cathartic projections.
-
Presumably in some book your have taken apart the epistemology and epistemology critiques of the (post)structuralism, psychoanalysis the Frankfurt school and marxist sociology more broadly, which underpin what you obscure and write of as "postmodern grievance studies"..
-
and argued for a return to the 18th Centrury but... trust me your legacy is going to be "grievance studies" and the "doggie rape culture.....ha ha what degenerates".
-
@ConceptualJames@PeterBoghossian I did spend some time trying to explain what brilliant bait "Expressing Concern..." was though and I'm curious to what extent you made the same calculations I infered. see thread:https://twitter.com/izricklyn/status/1052622731076886528 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Who funds your work?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.