No, they, like the other gate keepers already in the academy want to mock it. All these PhDs had to do was create what they wanted to see, tho it already exists. Instead of spending energy belittling a minorities corner. And, if alt-right media is making them darlings...https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/1052726026504196096 …
-
-
Replying to @brownstocking
We couldn't publish anything rigorous or unbiased. Look at the reviewer comments. Again, you are pretending 'minorities' are a monolith who all agree with you. In reality, they are just as likely to agree with me and want to see rigorous, evidence-based & unbiased scholarship.
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @brownstocking
And we have had plenty of support from the left and the right. Mother Jones saw the problem and even Buzzfeed was balanced. The problem of saying that everyone who disagrees with you is racist & sexist is a primary one that we are addressing.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
You're not speaking w/me: you're setting up arguments that aren't mine. I didn't
@u; I care about the hoaxees. Y'all three won the day, maybe continued the tide. Congratulations. But truly minoritized theory/representation is still minoritized in academia.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't know what that means. We have targeted the most influential scholars talking the most irrational & illiberal crap. This needs to be minoritised.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.