No, they, like the other gate keepers already in the academy want to mock it. All these PhDs had to do was create what they wanted to see, tho it already exists. Instead of spending energy belittling a minorities corner. And, if alt-right media is making them darlings...https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/1052726026504196096 …
-
-
I'm not talking about a monolith, I'm wondering about those y'all specifically targeted. I'm nervous that enough traction has been gained that those who do "rigorous" by as subjective standards will continue to ghettoize the area studies. Backlash is real.
-
Not sure what that means.
-
The good work y'all hoped to do will harm the most vulnerable, not your "illiberal" academicians. It's what happens in systems. And as one invested in critical theory *and* praxis for positive societal change, I'm reading the writing on the wall.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And we have had plenty of support from the left and the right. Mother Jones saw the problem and even Buzzfeed was balanced. The problem of saying that everyone who disagrees with you is racist & sexist is a primary one that we are addressing.
-
You're not speaking w/me: you're setting up arguments that aren't mine. I didn't
@u; I care about the hoaxees. Y'all three won the day, maybe continued the tide. Congratulations. But truly minoritized theory/representation is still minoritized in academia. -
I don't know what that means. We have targeted the most influential scholars talking the most irrational & illiberal crap. This needs to be minoritised.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.