This ahistorical bickering is about as far from "rigor" as you can possibly get.
-
-
-
What ahistorical bickering?
-
The assumptions underlying statements like "Marxism is obsolete" indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of Marx's critique of capitalism, it's historical impact, and its contemporary relevance to everything from economics to psychology.
-
And the consistently incorrect references to postmodernism show you're not really serious about the history of thought.
-
Righto, then. To be honest, I'm way less interested in the intellectual history of postmodern ideas and way more interested in the ones which caught on & were adapted in the late 80s and early 90s and are affecting society right now.
-
That's fine but it's like choosing one blister of a poison ivy rash to study and raising the alarm that we need to treat that one specific blister immediately nevermind the rash or the paths overgrown with offending vines.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I identify as not identitarian.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.