So many people arguing that evidence-based epistemologies are faulty are using an evidence-based epistemology to demonstrate this. You are not criticising evidence-based epistemology. You're showing that systems which claim to work on one don't always do it properly & how we know
-
-
Very clearly put.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One of the problems I saw with the Heterodox article on the hoax was implying to grant that there was some higher level of credibility with these fields by the fact that you had to get fluent with the language (one need to learn the terms of Scientology to write that nonsense).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I was just reading something that mentioned standpoint theory... Something which I didn't find epistemologically illegitimate at all... I think I need to go to the source of standpoint theory to see if what I was reading (which mentioned it) made as much sense as I thought...
-
The essay I was reading was entitled "White Ignorance"
-
... and the book would be considered "critical race theory". But the author (who seems to be speaking to a "radical" audience) warns about/rejects "relativism"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.