What is the criticism? That we should have focused on some kind of metastudy on problems with knowledge production across a wide range of fields instead of looking at a specific one? I'll be the first to say I don't have the expertise to do that. I couldn't test physics journals.
-
-
You have to forgive me for being confused then, by what you're trying to prove!
-
I *thought* this was a test of peer-review in these journals, but am I now to understand that their peer-review standards are beside the point?
-
@christianjbdev This was clearly a test to see if one could pass off complete rubbish as legitimate research and findings within the humanities if one flattered certain ideologies and political angles. It succeeded. Does that clear it up? -
Hey! Don't yell at him. Sincere questioner and friend. (Only I get to yell at him)
-
Its just hard to tell who is being sincere and who is not at this point. : (
-
Sadly, true.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.