They are saying we did not prove knowledge production to be worse in these fields than anywhere else but this project was not about that either & did not make that claim. We support people addressing other kinds of problems with knowledge production in other fields.
-
-
I can see that if a subfield is essentially printing fairy stories, then it's hard to compare its peer review to that of physics.
-
Peer-review systems are almost beside the point.
-
You have to forgive me for being confused then, by what you're trying to prove!
-
I *thought* this was a test of peer-review in these journals, but am I now to understand that their peer-review standards are beside the point?
-
@christianjbdev This was clearly a test to see if one could pass off complete rubbish as legitimate research and findings within the humanities if one flattered certain ideologies and political angles. It succeeded. Does that clear it up? -
Hey! Don't yell at him. Sincere questioner and friend. (Only I get to yell at him)
-
Its just hard to tell who is being sincere and who is not at this point. : (
-
Sadly, true.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.