I think there were some people who weren't obviously ill-intentioned or stupid who were failed to be convinced by this study. Some people found it very convincing, Other people were more skeptical. Of course, there were also character-assassins.
Yes, because then you have introduced a claim you need to support. But if someone is dedicating their life to studying Islamism, they don't need to also study Christian dominionism and they are quite likely to still be very glad that someone else is doing so.
-
-
I think they should at least be aware of the general situation with other types of religious fanaticism. Otherwise, they could be convincing themselves that some part of Islamism is uniquely bad, when, in fact, it could be a problem which affects many ideologies.
-
But, I also accept your point, that *taken too far*, this argument can lead to whataboutery. Of course, it can.
-
Anyway, I think we've done enough debating for one night. Unlike you, I'm not a very good Twitter debater, and I think I've reached my limit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This usually indicates a personal investment in a topic but not bias if that individual is not claiming no other problems to exist. I care abt humanities/ feminism/epistemology coz I wanted to be an empirical feminist historian. Great if someone else investigates science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.