However, I'm not sure how that would work here because if everyone agreed that its a problem that journals publish the things they do, they wouldn't be able to do that. They do it because people don't agree that this is a problem.
We are arguing that scholarship which draws on the postmodern premise that knowledge is socially constructed in the service of power & perpetuated via language - radical skepticism and cultural constructivism - exists in identity studies & produces irrational & unethical results.
-
-
We called this 'grievance studies' because it focuses on these systems of power from a Social Justice perspective which seeks to interpret all sorts of things as evidence of these oppressive power structures. We did particularly well finding evidence of problematic masculinity.
-
OK, I'm going to take a break from this conversation, cos it's going on so long, and debating anything on Twitter is *hard*. But, I hope there aren't any bad feelings.
-
Yes, I will gladly leave it here. No bad feelings. There have been resigned and sad ones where you are concerned for some time. I no longer have any wish to try to remedy them tho. You are who you are and I accept that.
-
Ah, so just a few bad feelings.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.