The Vox piece deploys a "moral contamination" argument, in asserting that, because Tucker appreciates the hoax, the project is tainted. That's poor reasoning. Also, the main contention of the project doesn't depend on acceptance rate *relative to* more substantial fields. /1
And people are going to think our motivations are bad. There has been much posting of pictures of our previous essay titles to contextualise our positions on Social Justice ideology and claim that we are ideologically opposed to it. We are. They disagree we should be. OK.
-
-
But, that is OK. People are allowed to have different opinions. And I'm pretty much fine with disagreement, as long as it doesn't involve journalists wilfully misrepresenting anyone's views.
-
I said "OK." I will continue to argue with them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.