I'm quite sure it is.
-
-
Well, I see all this stuff about 'grievance studies'. Are you making the claim that your hoax disproves certain subfields, which could be said to involve grievance of some sort? I'm not clear.
-
We are arguing that scholarship which draws on the postmodern premise that knowledge is socially constructed in the service of power & perpetuated via language - radical skepticism and cultural constructivism - exists in identity studies & produces irrational & unethical results.
-
We called this 'grievance studies' because it focuses on these systems of power from a Social Justice perspective which seeks to interpret all sorts of things as evidence of these oppressive power structures. We did particularly well finding evidence of problematic masculinity.
-
OK, I'm going to take a break from this conversation, cos it's going on so long, and debating anything on Twitter is *hard*. But, I hope there aren't any bad feelings.
-
Yes, I will gladly leave it here. No bad feelings. There have been resigned and sad ones where you are concerned for some time. I no longer have any wish to try to remedy them tho. You are who you are and I accept that.
-
Ah, so just a few bad feelings.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.