The paper he's complaining about contained utterly irrelevant data about dogs pooping on other dogs' heads and people doing jumping jacks to stop dog misbehavior. No eyebrows were raised.
-
-
But the data was fabricated, right? I read the areo piece about the whole thing and I remember reading that the data you used was fabricated.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AHappyFellow @ConceptualJames and
Also, why use the term "complaining"? I think there's a legitimate problem if you falsified your data, especially if said data was one of the reasons the paper was accepted.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sorry for your misplaced priorities.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Hey, I'm not the one who wasted 10 years of his life on a cheap stunt because he thinks the feminists are calling too many things sexist, or whatever.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Your grasp of facts rivals your ability to prioritize relevant details.
2 replies 1 retweet 49 likes -
Aren't you a math PhD? Shouldn't you be doing something with that? Or did you do this "grievance studies" thing because you can't or won't try to get something published in a serious journal in your own field?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
LOL. I left a academia in 2010.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
You left academia to pursue a career in complaining about feminists?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You are scraping the absolute bottom of the barrel with these replies dude, it's embarrassing. Don't complain about dishonest engagement if you are going to go for this.
2 replies 0 retweets 15 likes
Yeah. I'm muting it. I should have known better.
-
-
Sorry the man you quoted making a dumb joke didn't have rigorous intellectual discourse, I guess?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.