What if people could read postmodernism, understand it and still not think it worthwhile? So fed up with this refusal to accept that informed disagreement can exist. I get it from theologians too. It just ends conversation.https://twitter.com/johndavidebert/status/1051197804004040705 …
-
-
"You find that people cooperate, you say, 'Yeah, that contributes to their genes' perpetuating.' You find that they fight, you say, ‘Sure, that’s obvious, because it means that their genes perpetuate and not somebody else's..."
-
I understand if you don't find that interesting. But we did evolve competitive & co-operative behaviours as the rest of the social mammals did.
-
I do find it interesting. I just don't think the field of evolutionary psychology does a good job studying it, for the most part.
-
I tend to think it does because it is always tentative and wary of reaching firm conclusions. It's almost never them who make simplistic claims as tho they are facts.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Science does work on hypothesis it works on testable and predictive scientific theories that include genes, parts of the brain and DNA for a certain behaviour that does not happen outside of STEM fields like Evo pysch that's why biologists and scientist see it as a joke.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.