@janeclarejones As an aside, what irritated me about SokalSquared was making an academic claim, but not following academic rules. Bit like calling a foot fault in chess, when someone moves their rook along a diagonal. I don't think @HPluckrose quite got that, but then I can't
So the only variation in selection would have been how highly ranked they were. This would introduce the potential variable that low ranked journals accept rubbish, a criticism made of the conceptual penis: That two explanations sufficed. This is why we went for the highest.
-
-
Don't know why I said 'sufficed' - that two were possible. Also, we said very clearly that this was not controlled apart from the way we went about writing them. We went in and tried to see how it worked and reflect what was there & presented the results for others to judge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.