If your argument is not that, why do you state it implicitly in the Areo article?
-
-
-
You actually screenshotted what I did say. I can't comprehend it for you. And I'm not wasting any more time today on people determined to reinterpret. Bye bye.
-
I'm not at fault if you want to restate what you wrote or weasel out of it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Evolutionary Psychology routinely publishes stuff that's on par with your hoax papers, yet you seem to be a lot less skeptical about it. How telling.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also Nancy Etcoff
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
>Beauty standards. I don't think those are a thing. People don't get to choose what they find beautiful or attractive. It's not decided by committee.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.