Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
HPluckrose's profile
Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose
@HPluckrose

Tweets

Helen Pluckrose

@HPluckrose

Editor @AreoMagazine Secular, liberal humanist. Mother. Doglover. Writing book about epistemology & ethics on the academic left Helen.pluckrose@areomagazine.com

London.
areomagazine.com/author/hpluckr…
Joined August 2011

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
      Replying to @HPluckrose @KetanJ0 and

      I don't want gender studies defunded. I want it made rigorous. I'd actually like to teach it. I understand why people think it is providing nothing worthwhile right now tho.

      3 replies 3 retweets 24 likes
    2. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
      Replying to @HPluckrose @KetanJ0 and

      Do you react in this way when feminists who have argued a problem to exist somewhere in regards to women's rights then investigate it and test this claim? Would you say 'Your previous statements show your intent to argue that sexism exists. Therefore looking for evidence is bad."

      1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes
    3. Ketan Joshi‏Verified account @KetanJ0 Oct 10
      Replying to @HPluckrose @bernybelvedere and

      It depends how they did it. If they mask the full number of trials, ignore all negative results, perform no statistical analysis, fail to disclose funders, avoid peer review and then describe the work as an 'experiment', then yes.

      2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
    4. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
      Replying to @KetanJ0 @bernybelvedere and

      You are being dishonest. We have revealed all the information in our fact sheet and provided all essays and reviews. We didn't need to mention the ones which failed but we did. What statistical analysis do you want & how would it work? How did we avoid peer review?

      2 replies 0 retweets 28 likes
    5. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
      Replying to @HPluckrose @KetanJ0 and

      We cannot reveal our funders or our supporters although many have agreed to have their messages of support screencapped with identifying details removed. They fear being fired and dogpiled as racists, sexists & homophobes for wanting this addressed.

      2 replies 2 retweets 19 likes
    6. Musa al-Gharbi‏ @Musa_alGharbi Oct 10
      Replying to @HPluckrose @KetanJ0 and

      Frankly, I think your donors are right to be concerned about that -- as you yourselves have no doubt experienced personally. But it also seems perfectly fair to be concerned about "dark money" and how may influence research. I can truly see both sides on this question.

      3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
    7. Claire Lehmann‏Verified account @clairlemon Oct 10
      Replying to @Musa_alGharbi @HPluckrose and

      This is astonishing. Who funds the heterodox academy? Why should it matter?

      5 replies 0 retweets 14 likes
    8. Musa al-Gharbi‏ @Musa_alGharbi Oct 10
      Replying to @clairlemon @HPluckrose and

      First, HxA does publically disclose its donors: https://heterodoxacademy.org/about-us/philanthropic-donors/ …. Funding sources are relevant for evaluating research findings, for the reasons described here: https://www.chronicle.com/article/How-Academic-Corruption-Works/244703 …. (1/2)

      3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    9. Musa al-Gharbi‏ @Musa_alGharbi Oct 10
      Replying to @Musa_alGharbi @clairlemon and

      (2/2) But a lack of disclosure is a reason to pay extra scrutiny to research -- not to dismiss it altogether. So it IS a bad argument to say, "we don't know thier funders, so let's just write it off as propaganda." People are wrong not to engage with the findings, as I note.pic.twitter.com/9w4Z3E8r2K

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Musa al-Gharbi‏ @Musa_alGharbi Oct 10
      Replying to @Musa_alGharbi @clairlemon and

      And again, as noted above, donors are probably right to be concerned w/ "coming out" given how much Pluckrose, Lindsay and Boghossian have been smeared just for carrying out the experiment. But this anonymity does give people a legitimate reason to scrutinize influences/ motives.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
      Replying to @Musa_alGharbi @clairlemon and

      OK, but even if we were secretly really ill-motivated - far-right reactionaries who wanted to destroy universities & take women's & minorities rights away - would it make any difference to the sources we cited, papers we got accepted, reviewer comments we got?

      8:02 PM - 10 Oct 2018
      • 5 Likes
      • Fernando Gaspar Sceptical Canuck lunabravette Peter Boghossian
      1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
        1. Ketan Joshi‏Verified account @KetanJ0 Oct 10
          Replying to @HPluckrose @Musa_alGharbi and

          The answer is simply, 'maybe', but more importantly, 'sometimes without you knowing that it's happening', hence the need for disclosure.https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/can-the-source-of-funding-for-medical-research-affect-the-results/ …

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info