No, it hasn't. You even screenshotted the section in which we said specifically what approach to identity studies we were criticising and are ignoring the discussion which says this is not the case and asks people not to say that it is.
-
-
The criticisms leveled in this thread against Sokal Squared are a red herring festival. The salient consideration, if one trusts the self-reporting of the authors, is the unmitigated scandal of *any hoax-style paper at all* getting accepted in a sufficiently respectable journal.
-
Other considerations pale in comparison to this one. Again, if one trusts that the "experiment" went as the authors claim, the results are striking and grounds for academic introspection in the fields that got skunked.
-
We just want people to look at what got in & what was progressing favourably, what we cited in order to be able to make the arguments we did and how we were directed by reviewers. Then they can make up their own minds whether there is any problem in this kind of scholarship.
-
This is why I fully support Helen, Lindsay, and Boghossian. They are not advocating a scorched earth policy towards the various studies.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.