Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
HPluckrose's profile
Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose
@HPluckrose

Tweets

Helen Pluckrose

@HPluckrose

Editor @AreoMagazine Secular, liberal humanist. Mother. Doglover. Writing book about epistemology & ethics on the academic left Helen.pluckrose@areomagazine.com

London.
areomagazine.com/author/hpluckr…
Joined August 2011

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. alloftheponies‏ @alloftheponies1 Oct 10
      Replying to @merlinc2 @HPluckrose and

      Ideally I’d love to see one of the writers of these papers demonstrate how they would have reviewed it. I think it’d help bridge the gap between layman and academic. But they’ve already done a tremendous amount of work already.

      5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    2. Merlin "2-4 LAKERS 2019 CHAMPS" C.‏ @merlinc2 Oct 10
      Replying to @alloftheponies1 @HPluckrose and

      I'm still not buying the premise at all that a green-lit peer review is an indictment of the field itself or even that journal. It's one rung among many in scholarly assessment.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. alloftheponies‏ @alloftheponies1 Oct 10
      Replying to @merlinc2 @HPluckrose and

      The journal rated it as one of the top 12 papers published in the past 25 years.

      2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
    4. Merlin "2-4 LAKERS 2019 CHAMPS" C.‏ @merlinc2 Oct 10
      Replying to @alloftheponies1 @HPluckrose and

      That's a stain on the journal but not on the broader field of women's and gender studies, which is vast. Would you indict epidemiology or nutrition science writ large for publishing sub-par work that doesn't hold up to subsequent scrutiny? https://www.stat.cmu.edu/~ryantibs/journalclub/ioannidis.pdf …

      4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. alloftheponies‏ @alloftheponies1 Oct 10
      Replying to @merlinc2 @HPluckrose and

      It’s one of the most well respected and influential journals in the field. Where else are these fields going to inform themselves other than top tier scholarship?

      3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    6. Merlin "2-4 LAKERS 2019 CHAMPS" C.‏ @merlinc2 Oct 10
      Replying to @alloftheponies1 @HPluckrose and

      Again, http://retractionwatch.com  Why is this field singled out, other than the authors don't like its particular politics or theoretical underpinnings? (It's not my cup of tea, either, but I think their critique is in good faith or all that clear.)

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
      Replying to @merlinc2 @alloftheponies1 and

      It's the field of epistemology which we have expertise in. We support people with other expertise finding other problems with knowledge production in their fields - eg the current debate about whether fat has been unfairly linked to disease in service of the sugar industry.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    8. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
      Replying to @HPluckrose @merlinc2 and

      But we wouldn't necessarily complain if they focused their attention on that and didn't also learn about postmodernism and critical theory which drew on that and the epistemology which stems from this. Or about replication in social science. Or some debate over cold fusion.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    9. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
      Replying to @HPluckrose @merlinc2 and

      It is very possible to focus on a single problem which you know about and/or which affects you without asserting that there are no other problems in the world. In academia people do specialise & it is not at all suspicious if they address problems in one field and not every field

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    10. Merlin "2-4 LAKERS 2019 CHAMPS" C.‏ @merlinc2 Oct 10
      Replying to @HPluckrose @alloftheponies1 and

      I don't have any particular sympathies to the academic or political tendencies you critique, btw. As an outsider, tho, you look like you're imagining a bigger target than you're hitting.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
      Replying to @merlinc2 @alloftheponies1 and

      Where? What did we say that made you come to this conclusion?

      6:02 PM - 10 Oct 2018
      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Merlin "2-4 LAKERS 2019 CHAMPS" C.‏ @merlinc2 Oct 10
          Replying to @HPluckrose @alloftheponies1 and

          Putting aside the debates about how you arrive at your assessments, the tendencies you guys decry are a much smaller enclave of the university than you think, and more importantly, that ppl reading your work will be lead to believe.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
          Replying to @merlinc2 @alloftheponies1 and

          Show this, then. I've spent several years documenting with evidence what I am worried about.

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        4. Merlin "2-4 LAKERS 2019 CHAMPS" C.‏ @merlinc2 Oct 10
          Replying to @HPluckrose @alloftheponies1 and

          Sure. Here's a more superficial one, but the impact factors of the journals you cite are all under <5. Gender, Place, and Culture has a 1.0something. They may have high within-field influence (for argument's sake), but university or humanities-wide? Not so.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
          Replying to @merlinc2 @alloftheponies1 and

          That would only be a good argument if we'd claimed the problem to be within the whole university or humanities and not been very clear that we are not saying that.I asked for evidence we that we are saying it is a bigger problem, not stuff consistent with us saying it is specific

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        6. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
          Replying to @HPluckrose @merlinc2 and

          Gender, Place and Culture is the top feminist geography journal. We have been very clear that we are not criticising the field of geography but subdisciplines which approach it from a grievance studies perspective.pic.twitter.com/yBwc18RrBS

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        7. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
          Replying to @HPluckrose @merlinc2 and

          Why are you so determined to have a problem with our project when I have shown you evidence to answer all your concerns? It feels as though you want this to be bad somehow, even tho you have said you don't have sympathies with this kind of scholarship.

          6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        8. Merlin "2-4 LAKERS 2019 CHAMPS" C.‏ @merlinc2 Oct 10
          Replying to @HPluckrose @alloftheponies1 and

          LOL, I'm not so determined. Like you say, I don't have a dog in this. But big-picture, my greatest concern is collateral damage to public perception of hum/soc sci inquiry (writ large), esp. by conservatives who are attacking the institution with a new vengeance.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        9. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
          Replying to @merlinc2 @alloftheponies1 and

          What would be the right way to address the problem we see? Should we not address it at all? How can it be fixed? Do you not think refusing to acknowledge a problem in our own fields and own political side can only weaken credibility of fields and left?

          2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        10. 3 more replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Merlin "2-4 LAKERS 2019 CHAMPS" C.‏ @merlinc2 Oct 10
          Replying to @HPluckrose @alloftheponies1 and

          In the same piece, you have hedging language about not generalizing writ-large beyond specified fields but then write about broader trends in the university elsewhere.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Oct 10
          Replying to @merlinc2 @alloftheponies1 and

          We are worried about a number of related things, yes, but I cannot respond to something as vague as that. If you think I am worried about something I shouldn't be, say what it is and show why.

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        4. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info