Their critique thus too easily blurs into a challenge to the credibility of any work that relies on an OBJECTIVE fact about the social world--that our lives, conceptual schemes, and moral attitudes have been shaped by systemic, coercively enforced historical inequalities.
-
-
Do you react in this way when feminists who have argued a problem to exist somewhere in regards to women's rights then investigate it and test this claim? Would you say 'Your previous statements show your intent to argue that sexism exists. Therefore looking for evidence is bad."
-
It depends how they did it. If they mask the full number of trials, ignore all negative results, perform no statistical analysis, fail to disclose funders, avoid peer review and then describe the work as an 'experiment', then yes.
-
You are being dishonest. We have revealed all the information in our fact sheet and provided all essays and reviews. We didn't need to mention the ones which failed but we did. What statistical analysis do you want & how would it work? How did we avoid peer review?
-
Al-Gharbi argues that in an ideal world, they would have subjected their findings to peer review (1st image) -- but also acknowledges that it did not seem possible in this case (2nd image) due to the fact they were about to be "scooped" after being prematurely exposed.pic.twitter.com/UTWn7r8nvI
-
Al-Gharbi was able to make determinations like the one attached here, precisely because the trio did provide rough information on thier failures.pic.twitter.com/PXeepqBv4p
-
It is true they did not disclose thier donors, as would be typical for a published research paper. A recent article in
@chronicle well-explains why this kind of disclosure is important for evaluating research: https://www.chronicle.com/article/How-Academic-Corruption-Works/244703 …. -
However, as it relates to the other criticisms, the trio DID disclose some information on failures, and peer-review may not have been a realistic option, all things considered.
-
We disclosed all of it and even presented the early papers which failed and which we now cringe about having become much more proficient in the field. And no, the project is incomplete. We think 10, probably 12 would have got in but we cannot claim certainty of this.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
* USA LEFT = Socialism = Equal Outcome + "Diversity" + Censorship + Open Borders + Victimhood/Group blame * Feminism After 1980 = Socialism * NON LEFT = Democracy = Equal Opportunity + Merit + Free Speech + Proper border control + Individual accountability
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I want to see the west Remove all government funding from ALL activism Remove all government funding from ALL religions Remove all arts and gender studies courses/degrees from pubic funded universities The truth behind gender studies since the 80s is its SOCIALISM studies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.